The report emphasized the stark difference in the media coverage in regards to language, headlines, and narratives. The language used in the Western media to discuss both crises uncovered the duplicity and double standards of the US and European media in their claims of objectivity. Their objectivity was simply thrown out of the window in their coverage of the war in Ukraine. They are mostly positive in their coverage of the Ukrainian resistance, but when they cover the Palestinian resistance, they are either negative, or rarely “objective” at best, although both cases express resistance against the illegal occupation.
Moreover, they are fiercely positive of the condemnation and sanctions imposed on the Russian Federation. On the other hand, they are wary at best of any sanctions or boycotts of the Israeli state. In fact, most acts of support to Palestine by celebrities are portrayed as “antisemitic”.
Latest from Policy Papers
Press Release ……………………………………………………………………………. On Monday 21\8\2023, The Forum for Development and Human Rights Dialogue issues a
The Research and Studies Unit of the Dialogue Forum for Development and Human Rights issued on
The Forum monitored the phenomenon of bullying as an obstacle that prevents the enjoyment of a
The report stated that conflict is one of the main reasons for people to leave their
The report discussed corruption in the Southern African countries: Botswana, Namibia, and South Africa, while providing